Thursday, June 23, 2005
A Swede's take on Moscow
Monday, June 13, 2005
Aeroflop
At 10:07 PM, Tim said…
Ah, Aeroflot.....all the comforts of a military transport without the organisation.
Tim, would you believe it if I told you they delayed our departure for 2 1/2 hours AFTER the plane had been fully boarded? Of course you would... I then overheard a stewardess threatening a stroppy passenger with revealing to all of the other passengers that he had been the tardy one responsible for us missing our take-off slot and being delayed. Shut him up real quick.
Sitting on the tarmac, thankfully we were able to activate the seat-back ventilators (unique to the IL-86 and IL-96, as far as I've seen), although mine emitted a subtle odor of indeterminate origin which was extraordinarily foul when inhaled deeply. This photo shows the seat-back fan, as well as revealing that if you want to hang a coat on the back of the seat AND have personal ventilation, you're outta luck on this airplane:
An additional design flaw that's visible here is the placement of the seat numbers on the back of the seats - this never fails to cause mass confusion during boarding.
And a killer design flaw that's sort of visible here is the not-so-ingenious seat-back table, which folds in half when not deployed. The problem with this space-saving measure (necessary to make room for the seat-back ventilator) is that the table won't fold or unfold unless the person in front of you has their seat fully upright. So, getting ready for a meal and tidying up afterward involves manhandling your neighbor's seat forward in order to deploy or stow the troublesome table.
The above photo shows why so many things have to be on the backs of the seats on this plane - there's no overhead bin unit above the center row of seats. While this does create a rather expansive - one might even say cavernous - sense of space, it does make you wonder what the design goal was. It certainly wasn't to allow them to screen movies using a projection system, as the state-of-the-art IL-96 we were on had (as I mentioned before) nary a video monitor or projection screen in sight.
All in all, the plane we were on was definitely not worthy of its namesake, the Soviet pilot Valery Chkalov.
Then, when we arrived at Sh-2, we made it through passport control quickly, but then had to wait about 45 minutes for our luggage to come out. That is the law of Sheremetyevo arrivals - you will wait somewhere, it's just a question of where. Sheremetyevo seems to have opened a second bank of passport control windows, which is a shocking customer service improvement unless it's just something I didn't notice before, and added - gasp - SEATS in the baggage return area where the little duty-free shack used to be.
I guess they figured that most people would rather sit and cradle their head in their hands in despair while waiting for their luggage to emerge from the wall than shop for overpriced liquor and perfume. Plus, with the added passenger throughput of the new (I think) passport control windows, but no addition of new baggage carousels, all they've really done is moved the bottleneck a bit, since people get pretty backed up at the baggage claim. so there should be plenty of people waiting and looking for a seat.
OK, I've spent way too much time on this subject already, and now I must get some sleep, so the blogging on more profound topics (which you have of course come to expect in this space) will have to wait for another day.
Sunday, June 12, 2005
Heading home
I can't say that I'm looking forward to this flight. On the way here, I had been assuming that Aeroflot would fly decent equipment on such a long flight, and was unpleasantly surprised to find myself seated on a Russian-made IL-96. Forget the in-flight movie (in Aeroflot economy class they always seem to have "technical difficulties with the video system" anyway) - this plane didn't have a single monitor or TV screen anywhere. And rather uncomfortable seats, which made the redeye here less than restful. I'm expecting the same on the flight back.
At least we will have very pleasant memories of this trip. The wedding last night was at an incredible venue, a club situated in a villa in the French Concession which apparently used to be the British Consulate and is quite posh.
Thursday, June 09, 2005
Greetings from Shanghai!
Shanghai is an amazing city. There is definitely lots to see here. In the interests of seeing more of the city and less of the basement of the Shanghai Library, I'm going to make this post short and promise to post some photos from here later (perhaps much later) once we're back in Russia.
Saturday, June 04, 2005
Технический перерыв
Деловая лексика (business lexicon):
перерыв по техническим причинам - interruption for technical reasons
Техника (equipment):
перерыв по техническим причинам - maintenance outage
Телекоммуникации (telecommunications):
перерыв по техническим причинам - out-of-service
Some people talk about their blogs "going on hiatus," or "taking a break," or use other phrases to describe what happens when they don't have time to update as much as they would like. I prefer the all-encompassing Russian phrase "tekhnicheskii pereryv." Literally, it translates variously as the phrases listed above. In addition, I actually found - at a website called for office workers called klerk.ru - a lively online forum discussion of the legal meaning of this concept, which is worth checking out for laughs if you know Russian.
In practice, though, as anyone who's ever needed to (just for example) urgently change money in a one-exchange-booth town knows, it's a phenomenon that can occur at any time, although generally at an inconvenient time, and for just about any reason. One cashier and she has to take a bathroom break? "Tekhnicheskii pereryv." The paper receipt roll in the cash register ran out? "Tekhnicheskii pereryv." Smoke break? "Tekhnicheskii pereryv." You get the point.
Anyway, I've been posting less than I would like to recently, and I'd prefer to just call this my own little "tekhnicheskii pereryv." I'm happy, though, to break with the usual custom and provide an explanation for it. I am going to be transitioning out of my job here in Moscow by the end of June, which is requiring a fair amount of preparation. At the end of the summer, I'll be moving back to my hometown of DC, and getting the move organized and making sure we have a place to live there are also turning out to be labor-intensive endeavors. Also, I'm going to have about 6 weeks free this summer and a bunch of Aeroflot frequent flyer miles to travel in Russia and the CIS, so I'm spending some amount of time just daydreaming - well, and researching on the internet, ordering guidebooks, etc. - about where I might be going.
On top of all that, we're leaving tomorrow (well, today, actually) for a week in Shanghai to attend the wedding of an old, old friend of mine from DC (how often can you travel someplace you've never been to attend the wedding of someone you've known since pre-K?). I'll try to post at least once from there just for fun, but hopefully we'll be busy seeing things we may never get the chance to see again.
Plus, we're trying to get the most out of what Moscow has to offer while we're still here. Tonight, we just got back from an awesome show by Russian punk rockers NAIV at Tochka. In addition to playing a great set, the band screened their latest video, for the song "Chto nam delat'?" ("What are we to do?"), which contains many images from the tumultuous Russia of the 1990's: tanks around the "White House," Zhirinovsky picking a fight on the Duma floor, and Yeltsin dancing drunkenly, just to name a few of the nostalgia-inducing moments. Apparently, MTV Russia has refused to play the video, because it's "too political." And on MUZ-TV (the home-grown Russian MTV clone), apparently, if you don't pay, your video gets no play. But it turns out there are alternative music television channels, such as "Alternative One," which bills itself as Russia's "first alternative music channel" (and which I hadn't even heard of before), who are willing to take the risk.
And now, back to our regularly scheduled tekhnicheskii pereryv...
On power and weakness
At 5:06 PM, danil said…Danil, I was actually unaffected personally by the blackout - I live and work in the northwestern portion of the center (around the Garden Ring), and in our area there were no power outages. I have heard lots of dire prophecies, though, in the past few days, about how this is just the beginning. Mosenergo is supposedly way overextended and does not have the capacity to deal with the increasing power demands of a growing metropolis, and people are saying we will see more blackouts in the future as a result.
hey lyndon where have you been? so much interesting things are going on last time ) khodorkowsky for example and light shutdown in Moscow - btw, did it affect you?
Who knows if that's true - back at the beginning of 2003, I seem to recall many people forecasting a "2003 crisis," because that was supposedly the year when deteriorating Russian infrastructure would reach a tipping point and would no longer be able to function without maintenance as it's been doing for over 15 years now (some would say for much longer). That never came to pass, perhaps because Russians are absolutely ingenious when it comes to squeezing the last life out of any piece of equipment that's on its last legs. For example, plenty of cars are on the road here which would be sent to the scrapyard in the US or in Western Europe, held together by baling wire and the figurative equivalent of duct tape, applied by their loving (or perhaps cursing) owners.
I have the utmost respect for the ability of people here to find ways to function under difficult circumstances, but unfortunately that's no way to run a power grid. The problem with always operating on the verge of a crisis and pursuing band-aid solutions instead of making real investments in infrastructure (I leave it up to the pundits - and the courts - to determine if this is the fault of Mosenergo, UES, or the Soviet legacy) is that it eventually catches up with you.
The more immediately disturbing fact which was revealed by the power outage is that many of the "strategic" establishments (e.g., places with nuclear reactors) which we've always been reassured have secondary sources of emergency power were revealed to not have good backup plans in place for an outage. Someone was supposed to buy a generator but pocketed the money instead, or the generator was there but someone had siphoned off the diesel for personal use. I hate to say this, but this underscores how ridiculous it is for people here to say that the US and "the West" are afraid of "a strong Russia." Yes, perhaps there was justifiable fear of the USSR 20 years ago, bolstered by the partial illusion of Soviet military might. But at the moment, I'm afraid the more realistic fear is of Russia's infrastructural weakness and institutional corruption creating environmental or other disasters.
By the way, I may be wrong to reject it out of hand, but I think Basayev's claim of responsibility for the blackout was absurd. He's recently claimed responsibility for some other disaster which was not likely his handiwork (it's escaping me right now what specifically), and I think this is part of a general pattern of him trying to grab the spotlight and show that he's not on the run.
As for your other question ("where have you been"), I'm going to deal with that in a separate post. There have indeed been lots of interesting events here in the past week or so, and the coverage at Siberian Light has been outstanding as usual.