Showing posts with label Mongolia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mongolia. Show all posts

Thursday, July 03, 2008

More on Mongolia


Feeling uncertain how to interpret events in Mongolia, I asked a friend with more experience there what he thought of suggestions from some Russian media that the post-election unrest is yet another "colored revolution" fomented by Western forces. Here's the response:
Nah. Of course it's the Russians calling it that; they want chaos so they can pounce. Note that the West isn't happy, but they were all about the revos in Kyrgyzstan/ Georgia. But in the end, it's nothing to Kyrgyz or Georgia. It's not a revolution. Because most people want the MPRP, who won. And they don't like the violence.

My prediction is that it'll pass, and the DPM (other party) will get a few carrots for not "indirectly" pushing for protests, which puts MPRP in position to use violence and makes them look bad. The last time there was an election, in 2004, there was nearly a 50/50 split, which created deadlock between the two parties, and then some compromise was struck. The next four years was a tussle between the two parties, with each trying to gain an upper hand but with the MPRP getting it. Mongolia suffers from corruption, so it wasn't principles that were being traded.

2008 was looked forward to as a time to "finally" give one of the parties a clear advantage to get things done, because the problem was: The political situation demanded the MPRP go populist to gain and maintain the upper hand (in other words, don't seem so elitist, support people against the mining companies); now, with the MPRP winning the majority, they can do what they need to do, and this can either be good or bad - good if they do good work, bad if their position in power only corrupts them further, as there are some bad apples in there.

Something that one of the articles about this said was true: that Ulaanbaatar (UB) is a place w/a lot of unemployed young adults in a difficult situation. It's ripe for violence. But it's not ideological, and nothing from the ground-up.

Watch - I'll be totally wrong. But this is what I got from being there [in the past].
It looks like at least one RIA Novosti commentator generally agrees: "The current unrest is unlikely to spark a revolution in Mongolia, which has merely stumbled on its way to democracy." If you're interested in how Russian media are covering the story, here is RIA Novosti's thematic page and here is Regnum's. Al-Jazeera's report follows the money, and AFP has what seems to be a decent roundup with some good photos as well as this fact-box (on the other hand, given AFP's reputation among international journalists for inaccuracy in breaking-story situations, perhaps I should be posting it with a disclaimer):

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

The "Yurt Revolution"?

Mongolians set it off

There is post-election unrest in Mongolia (see here and here, via GVO). Regnum has decided that this is a "colored" revolution and has dubbed it the "yurt revolution"; a commenter at dirty.ru picks up on this idea and points to an article last week in the WSJ Asia (and the SPB Times, but not the WSJ proper as claimed by Regnum, unless you count the online edition) by an AEI expert expressing concern about Russia's influence in Mongolia, titled "Genghis Putin" (and with a title like that, naturally it was picked up by InoPressa).

RBC also uses the "yurt revolution" moniker and turns one WSJ Asia article into alleged concerns by "the American media" at large about the elections in Mongolia, citing unnamed "experts" in also concluding that the events are "reminiscent of the 'colored revolution' scenarios in Ukraine and Georgia."

Don't these people understand that when "the West" sides with a colored revolution, even one that fizzles, they at least have a name and fashion accessories all picked out beforehand? Anyone remember the "Denim Revolution"? The only English-language mentions on Google News of a "yurt revolution" are in reference to the events of 2005 in Kyrgyzstan (more commonly known as the "Tulip Revolution").

The apparent lack of a pre-planned press kit and branding strategy for the Mongolian rioters defenders of democracy is not, of course, conclusive evidence of a lack of Western involvement, but still... before drawing any conclusions, I'd prefer to wait for further developments, and for the guys at Registan to weigh in on this - after all, it's more their bailiwick than mine. But for now they're silent on the story - perhaps because half of their formidable brain trust is still recovering after Budapest.